Flexible Work Arrangements Promote
Employee Retention & Productivity
Gregory P. Smith
While
balancing work and family has received a lot of attention over the
years, the truth is there’s more smoke than fire. People work longer
hours in downsized and super competitive work environments that pressure
people to make family a second priority. Many workers feel they must
choose between work and family. Either they must conform to get
promotions or sidestep their career for the family--a tough and bitter
pill to swallow.
No wonder thousands of good people leave good jobs to take
lower level, lower paying, more accommodating jobs elsewhere. This
dilemma has fueled the dramatic rise of home-based and female-owned
businesses in the U.S.
By creating a Flexible Work Arrangement (FWA), companies
can keep good employees and not force them to sacrifice family life. An
FWA will help them benefit personally and professionally and the result
will be people who are more loyal, committed and productive.
FWA's allow more options to employees who do not want or
need a standard work schedule. A properly prepared FWA allows greater
flexibility in balancing roles of work and home. It also can help
prevent valuable employees from quitting and taking a less suitable
position somewhere else. Most of the time a FWA involves fewer work
hours and possibly a proportional reduction of pay and benefits.
A survey by Flexible Resources of more than 500 women
seeking flexible work arrangements found that 64 percent of them either
quit or were planning to quit because of lack of work hour flexibility.
What was alarming was 59 percent of these women never asked their
employers to modify their work schedules because they assumed they would
be denied or lose stature. Younger women are more assertive in seeking
flexible work arrangements than older women; 72 percent of women between
the age of 25 and 35 were willing to request an FWA compared to only 30%
of the respondents of women aged 36 to 45.
Among those who requested a flexible work arrangement and
were told "no," reasons for the refusal ran the gamut in the following
priority:
-
We can’t give it to you and not the others (52%)
-
You will not be available to others (48%)
-
We have never done it before (24%)
-
You won’t be as productive as when you worked full time
(8%)
-
Your job is not conducive to flexible hours (5%)
-
There is too much work to do (5%)
-
It wouldn’t fit into a team atmosphere (5%)
But FWA's have drawbacks. People feel that physical
presence equals more opportunity for promotions and advancement. Men are
particularly vulnerable to the stigma that "if you are not at work
full-time you are not competitive."
Working Mother magazine has recognized the innovative
work/life programs provided by the Bank of America. Its "Child Care
Plus" program pays eligible workers an additional $35 a week per child
for employees earning less than $30,000 a year. After learning that
turnover for participants was about half of the peer group not
participating, BofA expanded the program to include workers with family
incomes of $60,000 and began to allow workers two paid hours a week to
work in their children’s schools. Finally, it added money for college.
Bank of America gives $2000 a year for employees enrolled in
undergraduate classes and $4,000 for graduate study. As a result they
were able to reduce turnover by 50 percent.